One of the leading scientists in advancing modern evolutionary theory was Sewall Wright. His work on inbreeding, mating systems and genetic drifta mechanism for evolutionary change resulting from the random fluctuations of gene frequencies (e.g. from... More
made him, along with R. A. Fisher and J.B.S. Haldane, the founders of population geneticsthe study of human heredity, its mechanisms and related biological variation. Heredity may be studied... More
theory. Their work was the basis of modern evolutionary synthesis also referred to as neo-Darwinian synthesis.
The inbreeding coefficient and F-statistics, which are standard tools in population genetics, were developed by Wright. His contribution to the mathematical theory of genetic drift led to its designation as the Sewall Wright effect; this theory represents cumulative changes in genea unique combination of bases (see base pairs) that creates a specific part of our... More frequencies that arise from random births, deaths, and Mendelian segregations in reproduction. Wright was involved in a longstanding argument with Fisher, who was convinced that most populations in nature were too large for the effects of genetic drift to be important.
Another important scientist involved in reconceptualizing genotypic and phenotypic variation was anthropologist C. Loring Brace. Brace was responsible for the observation that these variations, insofar as they were affected by natural selectiona mechanism for evolutionary change favoring the survival and reproduction of some organisms over others... More, migration or genetic drift, were distributed along geographic gradations called clines. This conclusion drew attention to the fact that phenotypic-based descriptions of races ignore numerous other similarities and differences, such as blood type, which do not correlate highly with racea recent idea created by western Europeans following exploration across the world to account for... More. This led anthropologist Frank Livingstone’s to conclude that “there are no races, only clines.”
Theodosius Dobzhansky, an American geneticist born in Russia, is known for his basic work in genetics and conducted much of his research with fruit flies. His writings include Genetics and the Origin of Species (1937), a summary of contemporary knowledge of genetics; Evolutionthe transformation of a species of organic life over long periods of time (macroevolution) or... More, Genetics, and A (1955); and Mankind Evolving: The Evolution of the Human Species (1962), which explores cultural and biological evolution.
- In 1939, race scientist Carleton Coon published The Races of Europe. By 1950, Coon had co-authored Races: A Study of the Problem of Race Formation in Man with colleagues Stanley Garn and Joseph Birdsell. In Race Formation, a placebased concept of race–a multi-regional theory–emerged that countered the neo-Darwinian interpretation of biological variability, which emphasized natural selection. With multi-regional theory, races were conceptualized as geographical races, whose defining characteristics were seen as the byproduct of adaptation through natural selection based on environmental factors. His hierarchal ranking resembled the scientific racismthe use of race to establish and justify a social hierarchy and system of power... More of the early twentieth century.
- American immunochemist William C. Boyd co-authored a publication entitled Races and People with Isaac Asimov in 1958. A worldwide survey of the distribution of blood types made by Boyd and his wife Lyle in the 1930s showed that blood groups are inherited and not influenced by environment. Genetic analysis of blood groups led him to hypothesize that the population differences between human races are found in alleles. This hypothesisa proposed explanation of observed facts. A scientific hypothesis must be testable. More prompted him to divide the world population into 13 geographically distinct races with different blood group gene profiles.
- Harvard professor Richard Lewontin helped establish the field of molecular evolution in a pair of papers that he co-authored with J.L. Hubby in the journal Genetics in 1966. Lewontin, an evolutionary biologist, geneticist and social commentator, helped establish the mathematics of population genetics and evolutionary theory. He found that the proportion of human variationthe differences that exist among individuals or among groups of individuals regarded as populations. Anthropologists... More that could be statistically explained by race was insignificant in a 1972 article. If it could be found that the relative degree of variation among races was significant compared to the variation within a single race, then race could be a statistically valid concept; however, if the relative degree of variation among races was not significant compared to the variation within a race, then race would have to be seen as a less statistically valid measure of biological differences. A series of papers using larger data sets have replicated Lewontin’s results, demonstrating that statistically ‘race’ does not explain a great deal about human variation. Neo-Darwinian theories which explain animal behavior and social structures in terms of evolutionary strategy-which has been controversially applied to humans, and seen as genetic determinism-as espoused by sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists such as Edward O. Wilson and Richard Dawkins, has drawn criticism from Lewontin. His opinion is that a more careful understanding of the context of the whole organism as well as its environment is required for a more complete understanding of evolution.